|
|
|
|
|
by joombaga
3293 days ago
|
|
> The victim would, after manual inspection, finally pipe the file to a shell Why would anyone do this? If I see some unknown, interesting file, I might run cat, head, tail, less or vim on it. If it's binary then maybe I'll use xxd. But it wouldn't even occur for me to pipe it to a shell. |
|
You could argue this is one of the reasons less doesn't interpret control codes by default. As it would let applications hide stuff like that to redraw the screen.