Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by amluto 3291 days ago
> But in practice, I guess this legacy architecture adds a nanosecond or two to a thread switch. Is that a big deal?

I would guess the total wasted time is more like 500 cycles. This won't make your game lag, but it does mean that extremely low overhead synchronous IPC can't happen on x86.
1 comments
mee_too 3291 days ago
What types of programs are impacted by the lack of low overhead synchronous IPC?
link
amluto 3291 days ago
As an example, there are a bunch of things that work well on microkernels on non-x86 architectures that involve splitting drivers across processes.

On Windows, a lot of the windowing system is in the kernel in win32k.sys. Microsoft didn't do this for fun -- they did it because the old way (NT3.5?) was too slow.

link