Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 1dundundun 3289 days ago
Interesting post from the comments ...

"The FBI did not investigate writers according to their literary merits. As Kurt Vonnegut's biographer, I can tell you that, despite his publishing Slaughterhouse-Five— one of the most popular anti-war novels of the 1960s— the FBI didn't keep a file on him. But the bureau did monitor the lives and works of Amiri Baraka, Lorraine Hansberry (a 1,000-page file), W.E.B. Du Bois, Ralph Ellison, Chester Himes, and Richard Wright, among others.

What the bureau opposed was African American literature and its potential— a backhanded recognition of that genre's power to influence readers. No cultural upheaval would be coming from the likes of Roth, Updike, or Mary McCarthy, for reasons you no doubt understand."
2 comments
pjc50 3289 days ago
Are people surprised that the FBI of the 50s was treating black intellectuals as some sort of alien internal enemy?

It's not as if this has changed much. Compare the treatment of e.g. Black Lives Matter with white groups or individuals which are overtly pro-violence, e.g. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/neo-nazi-br...

link
coldtea 3289 days ago
>Are people surprised that the FBI of the 50s was treating black intellectuals as some sort of alien internal enemy?

No, what's surprising is that some people think this was then, and things now are different.

link
M_Grey 3289 days ago
A lot of that "thinking" is either wishful, or sculpted by people who need post-racial apathy to commit their very racially motivated crimes.
link
Crontab 3289 days ago
This is the problem with allowing the government to have invasive surveillance powers - they use them not only to prevent legitimate threats but also to try to prevent the social changes that naturally should occur over time.
link
FullMtlAlcoholc 3289 days ago
> Are people surprised that the FBI of the 50s was treating black intellectuals as some sort of alien internal enemy?

> It's not as if this has changed much. Compare the treatment of e.g. Black Lives Matter with white groups or individuals which are overtly pro-violence, e.g. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/neo-nazi-br....

I think the implication is not much has changed

link
Spooky23 3289 days ago
This had more to do with J. Edgar Hoover, his unlimited power and personal baggage.

Civil Rights groups were branded as subversives with potential communist leanings.

link