Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by troutaway123 3297 days ago
> preserving access to the toolchain which operates trivially with files was worth the additional performance overhead of working with the files

Sounds like they're OK with that.

In any case, couldn't you avoid the kernel trips with some dylib foolery (assuming the toolchain is dynamically linked)?

1 comments

So: store the files in a database, expose them via FUSE, bypass FUSE and access the database?
Yep ;D