|
|
|
|
|
|
by newscracker
3291 days ago
|
|
|
My counter-point. Please DON'T do process-per-tab! I don't have a lot of memory (just 8GB, of which a lot is consumed by other applications running concurrently). I don't want Firefox to become like Chrome (with several processes - not necessarily process-per-tab, as clarified by others) and become all sluggish and slow down the system just because I opened 50 tabs (I open many more tabs normally)! For me, Firefox has always excelled in handling tons of tabs compared to Chrome. I'm also sure that the Firefox team is aware of the trade-offs and has thought through this for a long, long time. |
|
|