Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by scottlu2 3286 days ago
Not selling is hard too. People underestimate that a decision was made each day not to sell.
1 comments

Yeah but not that hard c'mon
Tell that to ex-bitcoin owners when it reached $1, $10, $100, $1000, ....
Well it is when you are dealing with huge amount of money.
Really ? You think holding on to a massive amount of shares in a growing organisation is a difficult thing to do ?

And in comparison to actually growing a company that is worth a similar amount its childs play,

Well, look at Microsoft's $150M investment in Apple in 1997:

https://www.engadget.com/2014/05/20/what-ever-became-of-micr...

By 2001, MSFT had 18 million shares of Apple, sold by 2003. Later a 2:1 and then a 7:1 stock split, would give them a value of $36 billion today (if my math and the article's math are correct), but was sold for a relatively small profit instead.

It's harder than you think to hold onto a massive amount of shares in a growing company.

You have supplied one bit of anecdotal evidence, you want me to list all the people/companies who held on to apple shares ?
There are lots more, here's a more systematic study from Fidelity:

" The average investor lost money in the Fidelity Magellan fund under Peter Lynch’s tenure during a period of time when the fund returned around 29% annually."

http://www.innovativewealth.com/wall-street-wisdom/individua...

It's easy to look back and say, wow, if I had invested at that time, I'd have $x m/b, but the temptation to "lock in gains" or "diversify" is really strong. And sometimes it is right!

Even someone like Warren Buffett complains that he has sold some his investments too soon.
Yeah. He also made a gazillion dollars holding.
Yeah but even someone like Buffett sells too soon which is what happens when you are dealing with huge amount of money.