[songgao]

Thanks for making `kbsecret` and having it based on KBFS!

> Records are shared under the /keybase/private/user1,user2,user3/kbsecret hierarchy, so adding or removing a user would just be a matter of changing the user list (moving the directory) and updating the session to match.

I wanted to mention that we are actually actively working on a feature called, not surprisingly, teams. It'll be useful for both chat and KBFS. A team has builtin mechanism for adding/removing members, and has its own sigchain.

This should provide applications like `kbsecret` with smoother support for team. So for KBFS for example, instead of `/keybase/private/alice,bob`, you'll have `/keybase/team/foo` which has Alice and Bob as members. When Celia joins the team `foo`, you can keep the same path `/keybase/team/foo` rather than having to move stuff (which is actually a copy-then-delete since it'd require re-encryption) to a new folder `/keybase/private/alice,bob,celia`. We'll also have a slightly different rekey process that makes this super fast.

[woodruffw]

> I wanted to mention that we are actually actively working on a feature called, not surprisingly, teams. It'll be useful for both chat and KBFS. A team has builtin mechanism for adding/removing members, and has its own sigchain.

Fantastic! That would be a tremendous boon.

> Thanks for making `kbsecret` and having it based on KBFS!

Thanks for making Keybase and KBFS; they're some of my favorite daily-use applications!