|
|
|
|
|
|
by TTPrograms
3306 days ago
|
|
|
In the example of the dirty bomb, I'm not sure that the number of casualties/cancer incidences is especially high, based on some brief search. Sept 11 seems like it was a more damaging attack, for example, and that seems roughly as difficult to replicate as a dirty bomb. Especially given the trade-off between payload and shielding your substances enough to prevent detection by the myriad of radiation detection systems I'm sure DHS has installed in major cities. But you are certainly correct that statistically these events are more difficult to interpret, and raw averages are not a fair comparison. |
|
|