|
|
|
|
|
by Jimmie_Rustle
3302 days ago
|
|
No. You're wrong, as it states in the article: "The reason: Google search results are based on an algorithm that scans the internet for free content. After the Journal’s free articles went behind a paywall, Google’s bot only saw the first few paragraphs and started ranking them lower, limiting the Journal’s viewership." |
|
So maybe this is why there's no Google cache.
Also, if Google can only index the first few paragraphs, the results are much less comprehensive.