Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by TulliusCicero 3306 days ago
I'm confused about what's inherently oppressive about making the border more secure. Personally I oppose Trump's stupid wall because it's a useless, wasteful boondoggle, not because having a secure border is inherently bad.
1 comments

So, you have a border that is not widely perceived to be a very big security problem, and most national security incidents have arisen through other vectors, and you propose redundant, expensive measures for border security. This raises the question of why, since "border security" doesn't seem like a realistic answer. The people who see it as oppressive believe the real purpose of this push for "border security" is a political statement to the effect of "brown people aren't welcome here." (Trump also kind of helped give this theory currency by claiming that Americans of Mexican descent are so likely to be biased against him due to the wall that a Mexican-American judge needed to recuse himself.)
ISIS has explicitly stated that it plans to infiltrate the US through lax border security. I think it is more than fair to take that threat seriously.
Should probably focus on the Canadian border in that case
America really needs to focus on reinforcing the wall along the border between the Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, and the Judicial Branch.
What makes you think all Hispanics are brown?