|
|
|
|
|
by killin_dan
3297 days ago
|
|
Honestly, I think most languages have shitty syntaxes (syntaxi?) and that the issue is not about visual programming. The other problem is that everybody who has a big idea for visual programming has the same, actually shitty, idea. Drag-n-drop blocks that represent logic. UML is not a thing anymore because it's useless and wastes time. Visual programming is great for describing high-level logic, but not low-level semantics. Try and describe your last trip to the grocery store with just emojis. Maybe you might get creative and come up with a paper for your list, some fruits and stuff like that, but how could you guarantee that the user on the other end of your description gets the exact same idea? You can't. With words, I can write my comment how I want, and I'm more or less guaranteed that people will read it the way that I intended them to, because it wouldn't make any sense any other way. |
|