Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by trsohmers 3302 days ago
I wasn't saying it wa snot a factor, and I totally agree with you, but the inverse square law per its exact definition does not apply here.

I think uBeam is another Theranos, but granted at a much smaller scale. Still can't believe it has raised so much money and so much press without basic questions really being answered.

1 comments

The inverse square law generally applies for focused beams as well. Why wouldn't it?