Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by adamb_ 3310 days ago
Compared to the # of users -- i.e. orders of magnitude greater -- that's a pretty reasonably-sized team.
2 comments

Compared to revenue it doesnt seem crazy either: at approx $150M in Q1-17, thats over $300k revenue per employee per year (if the revenue and headcount stays flat). Certainly there are many profitable companies at a ratio like that.

But for ad-fueled companies the bar to profitability and long term success is quite a bit higher:

Alphabet does about 4x that ($1.3M/employee/year) [0], and Facebook does even better ($1.8M/employee/year) [1][2].

[0] https://abc.xyz/investor/news/earnings/2017/Q1_alphabet_earn...

[1] https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/...

[2] https://newsroom.fb.com/company-info/

I think they meant SNAP the ticker symbol for Snapchat and not the government program.
I also thought it was that Snap initially.