|
|
|
|
|
by famil
3316 days ago
|
|
What do you think about take home projects/homework interviews?
I've noticed that they have become much more prevalent among smaller companies as a replacement for phone screens.
As a candidate, interviewing is already a time consuming hoop jumping process, so if the project will take more than 3-4 hours, I probably won't be interested but most companies I have applied to are keeping these projects short enough. |
|
1. The time commitment issue.
2. It allows a company to give a bunch of "interviews" (assignments) even for candidates they aren't serious about. It can waste a lot of candidate time.
3. There is so much cheating on these that you really can't use it for evaluation. It can really only be a screening tool (which makes 4+ hour assignments really unfair).
4. It primarily evaluates current skillset, not how good they'll be with a bit of training. It's the latter that you care about.
5. They're generally given with little thought about what the company really values. It's typically "uh, gee, we do iOS, give them an iOS app." These projects generally aren't very good at narrowing in on very specific things, like problem solving skills.
6. You don't get a lot of context about why the candidate did things a certain way, and how they would have done things different with some guidance. 7. The results vary dramatically based on how much time a candidate spent on something.
... among other issues.