|
|
|
|
|
by doorley
3316 days ago
|
|
Sounds like a promising piece of technology. What I'm more impressed with, though, is the scientific journalism. It's balanced, accurate, accessible, representative, and leaves out the hyperbole. I would pay for science journalism that read like this. Even better if it came with some biased, inflammatory, hyperbolic editorials on the side. |
|
Actually I was disappointed with the article.
The image at top shows two output streams: waste, and filtered water. I was expecting an explanation of this while reading the article. But as I read the words, the build-up wasn't matching the image.
Finally we come to: In a working system it would simply be a question of splitting the water stream into three as it left the processor, with the two outer branches being recycled and the inner one tapped and piped to consumers.
So, no, pretty sloppy.