|
|
|
|
|
by smlacy
3320 days ago
|
|
Biggest missing part of the article is the "Music" promised in the title. In other words: I was hoping to hear a musical composition or performance using samples generated by WaveNet. I think a better, more realistic title for the article would be more like "Generating Experimental Sounds Using WaveNets" or similar. Even the authors inclusion of animal sounds in the generation made this more of a novelty and not really useful for actual musical sound generation. Would be interesting to compare this approach with other "Less neural-net-y" approaches, like combining samples in the frequency domain and mixing samples over time. |
|