|
|
|
|
|
|
by a2decrow
3324 days ago
|
|
|
Let me ask a counter question. How much innovation in other countries was stifled because of the way the US companies operate? And to get back to Google and Facebook, these two companies are building walled gardens not unlike the way ISPs in the US operate. They either force the competition out or buy them. They do everything in their power to keep you inside their bubble. In a few years down the road, we may just end up with only the services those companies offer and no alternatives to go to, because everything that threatens their dominance will be suppressed with everything they got. Just like the US ISPs are doing it and the US government is doing it. The US getting some of their own medicine certainly isn't a bad thing. Maybe it'll wake them up. |
|
|
>"How much innovation in other countries was stifled because of the way the US companies operate?"
So the reason the US leads in tech is because they have stifled other countries tech development? Can you provide some concrete examples of that?
Maybe you aren't aware but foreign talent is a corner stone of U.S tech. More than a third of top US tech companies(Tesla, Qualcomm, Google, FB to name a few) have founders born born outside the US[1].
This has been discussed many times on HN. So why did those people go to the US and start tech companies? Were they prevented from leaving the U.S and starting companies in their native countries?
In terms of companies building walled-gardens and consolidating market share that is called capitalism and it wasn't invented in the U.S. Additionally nobody is forcing anybody to use any of those platforms. You yourself said you don't use them.
I get it, you are anti-American and your entitled to that. But your statements are really naive and seemed to be informed solely by anger. I find your sense of victimization quite sad.
[1] http://www.businessinsider.com/top-tech-companies-founded-by...