|
|
|
|
|
|
by loup-vaillant
3324 days ago
|
|
|
> sometimes the money you pay is actually for a caching proxy That would make sense, and I agree it could be sold and charged separately, though I don't like the conflict of interest (the temptation of prioritising proxy data at the expense of everything else). More to the point, is that even possible with generalised TLS? Or are big streaming web sites tailored for this capability? |
|
|