Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by peterwwillis 3324 days ago
Initial thoughts:

1. First heading text past the title bar has a typo. Yes, this matters. If you can't even get a second look at your website copy, did you get a second look at your product? 2. The domain was registered a month ago. 3. Like others mentioned, absolutely zero product information, and no information about whether they support the many industry standards that small businesses might actually need a security scanner for (are they wasting their money?). 4. The root domain only hosts http and not https, and the www site hosts both http and https, and none seem to advertise HTTP security headers. Considering this is a security product that takes your money: wtf? 5. The IPs used to host the site do not have reverse records. Again, wtf. 6. Leaks version and OS information of their DigitalOcean droplet.

Honestly, just paying a kid in high school the $20 to run Nmap and a webapp vuln scanner on your site might be a better investment.