| The author says a lot of correct things. When information belongs to one organization, then there is no future. Do you really think that we will receive information only from 1 organization? Monopoly on information, like any other monopoly will not be eternal. Today the information growing rapidly and they try to place everything on first page - it is impossible to display all the relevant information on 1 page, it is very restrictive. And I'm not talking about the fact that on this first page there are a lot of advertising links and artificially advanced sites. Model Yahoo has a future. And we are developing it: we are developing the Bubblehunt project, where each user can create his own search engine. This is decentralization, where each user can act as an independent information provider, like miniGoogle. A bit of advertising, sorry: https://bubblehunt.com - tell me, what do we need to improve? We strive to enable each user to influence the quality of Internet search and make it more social, transparent and dynamic. People are increasingly talking about the need to change something in search. Google is an excellent search engine, but it hides from us a huge amount of information. Every day born a lot of interesting resources and we get information only from sites that are on the 1 page of search. They become only more popular. And you need to pay money so people see your website! Is this correct in your opinion? In my opinion, Google will make a huge profit here and this is not very correct.
People just do not have alternatives. |
Consider showing some random examples from popular searches. I think DuckDuckGo have been doing this a while ago -- was showing search result page which was more relevant than what Google was showing.
Just one thought. Try to engage potential users. To me, your landing page says nothing.