[shubb]

This is a really good thing, and thank you for showing it to me.

Something like this could be good if you wanted to rapidly switch between different compartments on a single device. It would be great for e.g. keeping a 'sensitive data' compartment seperate from a 'emails and paperwork' compartment on a work laptop.

Doing something like this is certainly better than using a single device with no seperation or just user accounts.

Psychologically, I still think that training people to use different devices for different things is more likely to stick than (account seperation on steroids). This extends to physical security - not leaving a work laptop in your backpack in a nightclub cloakroom like you might a personal device. But in the end with that reason, at a small comapany where you can avoid hiring idiots, it's up to each person to decide what psychological tricks they need to get themselves to do things.

I wouldn't trust something like this to keep high security information seperate. When some exploit that escapes Xen or (for a corp) accesses windows systems otherwise securely configured, there is nothing like isolated networks to keep your blood pressure low. For most software a service dev type people you already have this - your data lives in a data center on carefully configured production servers. But for data science type users, you see a lot of people (especially in accademida) doing work with potentially scary datasets on local laptops they probably also watch pirate TV on at home, which is a bit concerning. I guess at least if they were using qubes it would be a bit better though.

[greedo]

Training users has been tried for over two decades and has largely failed to hinder black hats in any significant way.

[coldtea]

Failed on the users who took well to the training, or to those who ignored it/failed it?

Because we can always not care about those others in the context of what we should do.

[greedo]

Failed to improve computer security overall. Users (generally speaking, not HN readers) don't have the skills/inclination/time to be proficient at managing their systems. Efforts to educate them in malware avoidance, system upkeep etc etc are failures by and large.

Technology can only do so much to "protect" users from themselves, and from miscreants. Couple this with an indifference to privacy on most of the connected population, and you've got a recipe for a world where nothing is safe.

http://panelsyndicate.com/comics/tpeye