[jawns]

> It's at version 1, which may be the only version ever needed.

Wow. Now that's confidence. Have you ever read the first version of a spec and thought, "That's just perfect. Any additional changes would just be a disappointment compared with the original"?

[Johnny_Brahms]

MIDI 1.0 is maybe not perfect, but it is still unchanged since 1983. People have tried to replace it for 2 decades, but failed to provide any enhancements worth a switch.

But MIDI doesn't really fit that description since it builds on 2 years of work by Roland. My best bet though.

[vanderZwan]

In all fairness, they're taking a more or less solved problem (feeds), so they don't really have to figure things out there, and they're porting this established solution to a very well-established technology (JSON), so also don't really have to figure stuff out in that sense either.

As far as scenarios where it's feasible to get the answer right the first time go, this is a reasonably realistic one.

EDIT: Also, if you scroll to the bottom of the page you can see they have let a whole bunch of people look at the spec before releasing it, so there has been at least some peer review.

[efsavage]

Unsurprising as this is clearly an ego play, given that the first thing they want you to know is their names.

[smacktoward]

"Now it belongs to the ages!"