Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kt9 3324 days ago
Github should donate a license for Github Enterprise to gnome so that the gnome folks can have the best of both worlds - self hosted + github. Its a win for github to have a big project like gnome running on GHE.
3 comments

Gnome already discounted Gitlab Enterprise as an option because its proprietary.

It is very hypocritical to promote free software while using proprietary software that you got special privilege for on the backend. KDE had the same line of thought when they chose Phabricator - if features like LDAP weren't locked behind Gitlab EE they would have used that, but they were only considering freedom respecting options, because they are communities of hackers that want access to improve their tools.

What kind of LDAP functionality did KDE want? LDAP login is in GitLab CE (open source) but LDAP group sync is in GitLab Enterprise Edition (proprietary).

I wrote https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11092182 but I can't find LDAP references in any of the linked emails.

Gnome won't do that because Github is not open source software (a good thing, in my opinion).
Why is closed source software a good thing?
I read that as Gnome not using GH because it's closed software is a good thing.
Maybe the good thing he refers to is the premise.
Until github decides they don't need or can't afford this PR anymore. Or uses it to exert some pressure on GNOME for whatever ends and reasons.
GNOME is part of the GNU project, so the only "pressure" they could apply to GNOME is to make their enterprise offering entirely free software (at which point they will run it themselves because of GNUs and the FSFs position on Service-as-a-Software-Substitute[1]).

[1]: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-s...

I talked what would happen if GNOME was hosted on the (currently proprietary) GHE as OP proposed.
Ah okay, I misunderstood. ;)