|
|
|
|
|
|
by codehusker
3320 days ago
|
|
|
I should have phrased it as a higher ranking rather than a higher number. I assumed 'higher' was clear in the terms of ranks, rather than a larger number. GP's claim makes it seem like they interpreted as I did. > ...countries like North Korea (rank #1) are closer to 0... NK is not close to 0 in relative or absolute slave counts, and I don't see the utility in pointing out that 1 is closer to 0 than 52. |
|
|