|
|
|
|
|
by rubidium
3328 days ago
|
|
"A very old password (say 1 year) has a higher chance of being subverted purely because there is more elapsed time wherein attackers could have gained access." Any actual evidence for this? My counter-hypothesis is if your password lasts 6 months of attempted hacks it'll last >6 years (unless social engineering attempts succeed). I ask because rotating goes against the current NIST password guidance. In fact, for your recommendation "Implement simple but adequate password rules that encourage users to have long, random passwords", I'd recommend pointing people in that direction. |
|
With time passing, the chance of you or anyone with access to the password being socially engineered, or some other human error, or a hack on your PC desktop systems, increases linearly with time. The password may last a decade of brute force cracking, but we humans .... continue to make mistakes far more frequently.
So rotating passwords protects against the accumulation of human mistakes and insider threats.
If you are using proper hashing, then your passwords should be safe even if the hashes are compromised.
Could you please point to the NIST recommendation you mention. I thought they said that you should NOT force customers to change passwords. But that is different to you rotating your own critical passwords at a time of your choosing and on your policy.