[Artlav]

So, if it says "Error: IOCTL_MEI_CONNECT_CLIENT receive message. err=-1", what does it mean?

Tried it on i5-6260U, should be new enough to have the thing.

[knappa]

The issues page has a report of the same error (as does my i5-6600) and the author says:

>Ok, I'm /inclined/ to believe that this indicates that the system doesn't implement AMT at all, but I'll try to do some more research.

[rst]

I got this message on a system which has a Core i7-4510 CPU; this is not on the list of systems with "vPro" technology. I've seen referenced as another name for the vulnerable component --- but given the marketing-spawned confusion around Intel CPU nomenclature, I can easily imagine someone (perhaps me!) getting confused on the point.

Search for "vPro" systems here: https://ark.intel.com/Search/FeatureFilter?productType=proce...

[wmf]

This isn't that helpful because you need a vPro-capable CPU and the proper chipset and AMT firmware to be vulnerable.

[yorwba]

> Requires that the mei_me driver (part of the upstream kernel) be loaded.

Maybe the driver isn't loaded?

[Artlav]

It is.

[buovjaga]

Here is an issue for it: https://github.com/mjg59/mei-amt-check/issues/1

[guipsp]

Upgrade your kernel, or build the kernel with the AMT module

[SSLy]

4.10 is fairly new, and the amt mod is loaded

[chinket]

Cool. thx