|
|
|
|
|
|
by pjc50
3318 days ago
|
|
|
> majority of those British wanting more immigration control are struggling, you judge them from a position of relative comfort They're not being judged by officialdom on whether they get to live in the UK and freely move around it. They're only being "judged" in the sense of having the negative opinion of someone on the internet. Big difference. Maybe we should be questioning migration control on a more local scale? 200k people move to London every year. If London decided to end UK free movement, only allowing skilled professionals in, it could solve the London housing crisis! /s (That sounds absurd, but was in fact done to the Ugandan Asians who had their UK citizenship removed by act of Parliament) |
|
|
A bigger difference is that these are two entirely different things. I mean "judge" entirely in the sense of negative personal judgement, not immigration status. And since I'm addressing you here, and your own comment, I'm not sure why that matters.
> If London decided to end UK free movement, only allowing skilled professionals in, it could solve the London housing crisis!
London already has defacto movement control with high rent and living costs.
Will the free movement work both ways (No southerners migrating to the North without permit)? Will tax and governmental control be localised too? How will that work given historical investment in any area common property to the country?
Why do you consider a comparison within a country is valid as with other countries? If that's your angle - why is it fair non-EU countries excluded from free moment?