[TeMPOraL]

Me neither (too lazy for that), but I know they are used and abused by people too. This leads to funny cases I heard of like a company specifying that some shoes are for "walking", not for "running", and refusing to refund them if you admit to running in them.

[kebman]

You guys need Norwegian consumer protection...

[vsl]

As long as it comes bundled with Norwegian famously cruel child "protection" services, thanks but no thanks.

[mason240]

That doesn't sound too unreasonable. Some shoes like heels are made for fashion, not function.

[bigiain]

If it's "not unreasonable" for them to reject warranty claims if you run in shoes "not intended for running", does that mean it is reasonable to make a warranty claim on shoes "intended for fashion" if you're not picked up while wearing them?

"Wore these heels to six bars, didn't get hit on once. Please repair or refund."