[quirkafleeg]

> If you actually _read_ the article instead of looking for buzzwords and rushing to post a comment (first!),

I didn't see his now edited comments so can't comment on what he wrote, but since I did see your posts, why are you trying to write off as mere "buzzwords" the section of the article about a Human Rights Watch report of 70+ people being jailed, one for over a year, under material witness warrants?

Why are you suggesting he read the article (a no-no here anyway) if he quoted from it?

If someone wants to comment about something in the article[1] that you don't happen to be interested in there are better ways of dealing with it than attacking the poster, dismissing him as confused and accusing them of behaviour (scanning for buzzwords) and motives ("FIRST POST!") which you can't possibly support or back up.

[1] A lot of the time people here just use a keyword in the subject to dredge up some hobby horse that has nothing remotely to do with the article.