Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by DuskStar 3332 days ago
So the AMT vuln was related to a lack of security on their web service? Somehow this does not increase my confidence in the rest of their code - if they didn't get this right, what else is wrong?
3 comments

The Intel note mentioned a local vulnerability that allowed local non root users to provision AMT as well. That sounds like at least one more, different, issue.
To be fair, it is pretty rare (impossible) to find "secure" software that has zero avoidable vulnerabilities.
That's more of an argument about inauditable, non-disableable, hostile (the CPU shuts itself off if you blank out the appropriate data structures) code running below ring 0
Don't forget in the majority of cases unupdatable too! (No vendor is going to issue fixes for old boards)