|
|
|
|
|
|
by jcims
3337 days ago
|
|
|
That's required for transparency and they indicate as such directly on their abuse page: https://www.cloudflare.com/abuse/form This kind of thinking will drive service providers to invade customer privacy as a risk management strategy. How could Amazon, for example, allow customers to operate private workloads if society expects them to police said workloads for undesirable conduct? |
|
|
Other companies handle abuse reports just fine without ever having to give away the identity of the whistle blower.
> This kind of thinking
A public website is not a private workload. You are comparing apples and oranges. And in any case, Amazon prohibits offensive content in their acceptable use policy. https://aws.amazon.com/aup/. If someone reported you for unacceptable use, count on Amazon invading your "privacy".