|
|
|
|
|
|
by klibertp
3331 days ago
|
|
|
Yes! This is why I chose to use #@ instead of @, to avoid conflict with at-exp reader. As noted below by moron4hire, the @-exp reader is the better solution for this problem. I concentrated on providing an example of how to extend the reader, not on making an example of a useful or needed extension. I should have probably written this on top of the post... Anyway, thanks for reading! |
|
|