Y
Hacker News
new
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
by
gruez
3337 days ago
What did they do? All they did was refuse to unlock the perpetrator's phone. How do they have standing in that?
2 comments
misnome
3337 days ago
They enabled the perpetrator's planning and communications by supplying him the phone. I mean, they are just as culpable as Facebook, Google and Twitter...
...i.e. not at all, but a large and wealthy company to try and extort a settlement from.
link
usaphp
3337 days ago
By this logic you can sue the clothing company that provided them with clothes during their felony
link
NeutronBoy
3337 days ago
That's pretty much the point the GP was trying to make.
link
finid
3337 days ago
I think the guy was wearing underwear at the time, so Hanes? can be sued too.
link
chc4
3337 days ago
If they are sueing for allowing ISIS propaganda to be spread on Social Media, they might as well sue for not policing iMessage as well, I guess.
link
...i.e. not at all, but a large and wealthy company to try and extort a settlement from.