|
|
|
|
|
by roenxi
3343 days ago
|
|
Furious agreement that locks aren't a great analogy. I'd hazard that for most organisations locks are actually to remove temptation from employees; and the quality of the lock is largely irrelevant. A lock is only as good at stopping someone entering as the windows and doors are resistant to being removed. The advantages to locking something are:
* There is evidence that the door was forced after the event
* Very clear signaling of who is and isn't supposed to have access to a room. Unless serious money is spent, I would expect that locks are delaying access by a matter of maybe up to hours. If IT security were that poor, the world would look different. A better analogy would be spending the money on security guards. |
|
You're right about the signaling aspect, though. You can't very well pretend you didn't know you were supposed to be in a room if you had to get past a locked door to get in.