[nezza-_-]

This is a perfect guide on how to not respond to the release of a security researcher.

Also, for context, here is the original article from the security researcher: https://scotthelme.co.uk/nomx-the-worlds-most-secure-communi...

[darklajid]

Given HOW broken the setup was (it wasn't even a remotely decent mail server setup in the first place, let alone 'the only secure solution' of course), what did we expect?

The marketing material was already screaming snake oil. Now they're trying to put out the fire with .. more snake oil, avoiding any specifics related to the original criticism.

Sad. Absolutely expected, but sad nonetheless.

[tgragnato]

> as we’ve demonstrated to the blogger, the media and our customers

There's no demonstration, and they can't know if a customer has been compromised or not.

Selling snake oil is .. well, let's say despicable; but clearly lying when exposed is perhaps even worse.

I expect the decency to be silent, please.

[j_s]

Discussed here yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14209874

[floatboth]

Hahaha the best thing is how, because the admin panel is not HTTPS, the researcher's browser literally says "Not secure" :D