|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
3340 days ago
|
|
|
> The burden of proof in a theft of trade secrets argument is on the plaintiff Yes, but it's a "preponderance of the evidence" burden which means a literally any evidence for each of the required elements can meet it, if not countered by stronger evidence on the other side. "Proof" in law doesn't mean the same as in mathematics. (And in civil law, not even what it means in criminal law.) |
|
|