[enceladus_ice]

I recently watched a NOVA documentary from last year that refutes the Eurocentric theories of Clovis origins.

Great Human Odyssey: http://www.pbs.org/video/2365856257/

Geneticists sequenced the DNA from a young boy's 13,000-year-old bones found in Montana. His DNA matches a specific combination of Eastern Asian and Siberian DNA that is found in all North and South American native populations, and only in these populations. This lends to the theory that the first people to permanently settle the America's (Clovis) were made up of groups from Siberia and Eastern Asia combining and crossing the Bering Strait.

[flukus]

> Geneticists sequenced the DNA from a young boy's 13,000-year-old bones found in Montana.

Wouldn't that make the boy a member of the clovis culture and not the pre-clovis one being discussed?

[enceladus_ice]

Yep, the article is talking about a group of people that are definitely pre-Clovis, which is super exciting!

I was replying to WalterBright's comment mentioning the Clovis culture coming from what is now Europe.

[red_hairing]

but given political considerations, can that particular science be trusted?

[Steko]

If you're going to object to their science, let's hear the actual objections and not just handwavey notions that somehow the science is bad because you don't favor the conclusions.

[enceladus_ice]

Which political considerations are you talking about?