|
|
|
|
|
by nickjarboe
3343 days ago
|
|
The journal article in Nature can be found here[1]. The abstract is publicly accessible with the article behind a paywall. I'm not familiar enough with the dating method to comment on the possible problems of the age determination, but it was calculated by the complicated method of "230Th/U radiometric analysis of multiple bone specimens using diffusion–adsorption–decay dating models indicating a burial date of 130.7 ± 9.4 thousand years ago." [1]https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v544/n7651/full/nature... |
|