|
|
|
|
|
by sandstrom
3344 days ago
|
|
This is far from the only reason, but I think one reason is UK running a two-party system. The proponents (sitting parties) call it first-past-the-post, to make it sound like a fair system. But most people know that proportional voting systems are better. With a two party system there will always be debate, but it won't be as real as it is with proportional voting. The parties run no real risk of not getting elected. It also drives the two parties to each side of the 'spectrum', which isn't very constructive. Take a look at these lists[1][2], see any pattern in which countries are using which system? [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_representation#Li... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-past-the-post_voting#Lis... |
|
The people voted No overwhelmingly (68% No, 32% Yes).
As with the Brexit referendum, those that lost complained afterward that the public was mislead, weren't given appropriate choices in the election etc.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Alternative_Vot...