I found the display of previous attempts a little hard to decipher (1-2-3-4 labelling would be much easier to parse, for me), but other than that great fun, and exceptionally polished presentation!
Conceptually i kept applying direction to success/failure. Eg, if one of them was correct, i kept fighting the assertion of the direction being correct, ie if 3 was correct i kept thinking 2 was related to 3's "correctness".
I imagine 1-2-3-4 would help my confusion a bit. It's weird though, i know it doesn't work that way, but i kept thinking that.
I imagine 1-2-3-4 would help my confusion a bit. It's weird though, i know it doesn't work that way, but i kept thinking that.