|
|
|
|
|
by frik
3344 days ago
|
|
File metadata is not cruft. It's a very good thing. Vista's/Win7 Explorer.exe with its metadata columns is GREAT. Even better was Windows (Live) Photo Gallery. Sadly it's dead since Feb 2017, you can't even install it anymore, as only a now broken WebInstaller exists. Photo Gallery was hand down 1000 times better than Picasa/Lightroom/Photos/iPhotos for just browsing photos and videos. And it alo supported tags with hierarchy (eg "City/New York/Manhattan"). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Photo_Gallery Sadly WinFS failed, metadata is nowadays often misunderstood and persived by companies contra productive in the age of cloud service strategies. Flickr is probably the only well known photo service tht keeps metadata. Facebook made it popular to strip metadata and keep annotations internally (as vendor lockin) - now common also with other services. I hope there will be a kind of come back of metadata. People need more education to understand the concept, that's all. |
|
It's cruft when those assets are now embedded into your compiled, bundled, distributed software and such metadata now has no purpose whatsoever, as is the case for the examples cited in the article.