|
|
|
|
|
by pikzen
3350 days ago
|
|
>Do we know any reason for C# not to adopt this as well? Because delegates are a much easier way of dealing with things? Especially with lambda functions.
Unless you're talking about the java pattern of passing an entire anonymous class for, let's say, a formatter or something. The reason for C# not to adopt that seems to be that: - It's so terribly awful, who in his right mind is happy to implement yet another anonymous class?
- API design is different and .NET manages to avoid the need of those quite gracefully. |
|