| > we're not, in fact, living in some Orwellian dystopia At what point along the path to that dystopia are you going to recognize that a problem exists and fight against it? It's far better to detect and try to fix problems before they spiral out of control. If you're waiting until you see a stereotypical Orwellian dystopia, it's too late. > surveillance that is being done is promulgating a safe and stable society Although many people claim surveillance is correlated with safety, there is very little evidence of it having any benefit. > not toeing the sky-is-falling line doesn't do much for those numbers by my username. That's not from a any party line, but instead is probably a reaction by the people trying to prevent a dystopian future. Pretending that problems don't exist just because they are not yet sufficiently terrible is how small problems grow into larger problems. > is undermining the rule of law. We've seen a many examples of that in recent times. I you believe the US is properly ruled by laws, you haven't been paying attention. We've had a two-tier justice system for such a long time it's spawned slang phrases such as "driving while black". Hang out with public defenders for a few days if you need any more proof. |