|
|
|
|
|
by CriticalSection
3357 days ago
|
|
Industrial capacity utilization is currently less than 76%, which is historically low. So about a quarter of invested capital is sitting idle currently ( https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/scribd/?toc_id=296052&filepath... ) ( https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/revisions/Curren... ). Why tie up money in new capital expenditures when about a quarter of existing capital is sitting idle? Ben Bernanke referred in 2005 to a "global savings glut". The conditions which led to that haven't changed much over the past 12 years. Gross domestic private investment, fixed nonresidential investment increased 2.8% between 2004 and 2014 (I exclude investment in fixed residential structures as that plummeted by 4.9% in that time frame). Computers and software was the sub-field where investment increased the most, by 6.1% a year ( https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_table_405.htm ). Whereas from 1994 to 2004, gross private domestic investment increased at a rate of 5.5% a year. Computers and software investment increased at an average rate of 26.5% a year between 1994 and 2004 (ref: same link). You have to measure investment against GDP and profit rates as well. In short, Apple is doing what a lot of people with liquid capital are doing, holding onto it. |
|