Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by slau 3356 days ago
I'm in the market for a new NAS, but I don't think this would have enough oomph to be very useful.

I understand that it's by design, and that I'm probably not the target demographic, as others have pointed out, the 512MB of RAM, lackluster CPU and 2.5" drives are all pretty disappointing.

This is estimated to cost $168. For $250, you can get an HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen8 Entry, which comes with 4GB of ECC RAM, a 2.3Ghz dual core x86-64 CPU, dual gigabit that supports line-speed link aggregation, and takes 4 3.5" HDDs. It's upgradable to an i3 or Xeon CPU, 16GB of RAM, and can be modded to take another 2 or 3 2.5" drives.

I appreciate that it's fully open, which is definitely a massive appeal, but if I need to run another machine (with blobs) next to it to actually operate on the data, what's the point?

3 comments

I think it depends on your needs for performance. Most personal applications (streaming music, video or storing backups) aren't going to be affected much from having a 2 gigabit link.

At 10 watts, there is a good opportunity for some power savings. I have an Atom-based HP MicroServer and it lives in the area of 30-40 watts idle with 5 3.5" drives. Going down to 10 watts would mean saving around $40/year for me, not bad, but not enough to worry about.

The biggest failure with this in my mind not supporting 3.5" drives. Getting decent capacity in the 2.5" form factor is not really possible, and if using SSDs, in that case you'd want a more performant machine like you describe. Then again if using SSDs, why not just use an even smaller form factor.

I bought my current NAS by being fed up with my Apple Time Capsule and sorting by cheapest price and going down the list until I found something suitable. All I needed was storage attached to the network with decent throughput and OS X Time Machine support (=AFP). I ended up with a Synology DS216j.

The GnuBee matches the Synology in price and exceeds it in functionality (aside from the 2.5" drives - seems like an extremely odd choice).

I think the problem with this product is you have two categories of NAS buyers - the ones who want plug and play storage on their network, and the ones who want the best performance and all kinds of esoteric features.

The former will go for a commercial solution like Synology/QNAP, the latter will go for something like what you suggest or a home-made solution.

This product targets the former in specifications, but the latter are the ones who care (or probably are even aware) about open source. Add to that that open source software usually has dreadful usability...

Where are you finding the micro server's for $250? The lowest I can find them for is $379 at Amazon. Not exactly a deal.

I'm deciding between drobo (plug'n'play) and a DIY freeNAS right now. If the price is right I'll do the DIY freeNAS.

I checked quickly on Amazon, which defaults to the UK one [1].

In Denmark, where I live, they go for 1700 DKK[2], which is $242. Want me to ship one for you?

[1]: https://www.amazon.co.uk/HP-Enterprise-ProLiant-MicroServer-...

[2]: https://www.computersalg.dk/i/1211353/hpe-proliant-microserv...

Thanks but FX conversions and duties would kill any benefit there. I appreciate the thought though.