[dang]

I don't believe I mischaracterized anything; you did throw a gratuitous provocation in that comment (more than one in fact). Obviously, though, I'm not describing one comment but a longstanding pattern. If you want to continue commenting on HN, this needs to stop.

I've made many attempts to explain, don't believe anyone could accuse us of being impatient with you, and do believe you're more than smart enough to understand. If your account consistently produces troll effects on HN, which it does, then at some point it's you who are responsible—not people who can't handle the truth, don't want 'man' to know things, don't know math, or however else you blame others. At some point enough is enough.

If you really need a further explanation I'd be happy to try, but would need some indication that you're asking in good faith.

[eveningcoffee]

I would argue that if anybody is trolling, they are the authors of the article.

Alternative and less biased conclusion: language corpora reflects statistical distributions in the society.

[dang]

That's a separate issue.