[agroot12]

You mean we should fact check the unsealed emails?

Let me quote one of the more explicit parts of the article:

> Court records show that Monsanto was tipped off to the determination by a deputy division director at the E.P.A., Jess Rowland, months beforehand. That led the company to prepare a public relations assault on the finding well in advance of its publication. Monsanto executives, in their internal email traffic, also said Mr. Rowland had promised to beat back an effort by the Department of Health and Human Services to conduct its own review.

> Dan Jenkins, a Monsanto executive, said in an email in 2015 that Mr. Rowland, referring to the other agency’s potential review, had told him, “If I can kill this, I should get a medal.” The review never took place. In another email, Mr. Jenkins noted to a colleague that Mr. Rowland was planning to retire and said he “could be useful as we move forward with ongoing glyphosate defense.”

For me, this qualifies as 'big evil corporation' behavior. [edited: formatting]

[Karunamon]

That doesn't make them automatically guilty of every evil thing people tend to pin on them.

By all means, let's hold them accountable for the evil they've provably done, but the oft-repeated "they sued a guy who had seeds wind up on his field" is throughly debunked.

[ionised]

> That doesn't make them automatically guilty of every evil thing people tend to pin on them.

No, but it does give people the justification for intense suspicion and cynicism when it comes to the company in question.