|
|
|
|
|
by rick888
5851 days ago
|
|
"1. Student loans and such all the machinery students today use to get their tuitions would still exist; they'd just be given directly to the student. 2. It would be a workers' cooperative, with the labor being learning. 3. Joining and participating would be different steps. The network would be free to join, but each class would still cost money, raised and pooled to create the class (in the fashion of groupon.com)" As a student, I would still need to pay for infrastructure, a professor, and any other costs associated with the class. In addition to this, most students have no idea what they want when they start college. They need to be guided. Unless there is some sort of central authority creating all of the classes, I think it just wouldn't be practical. If you joined for free, what would be the purpose unless you were going to actually get an education/pay for class? |
|
For the connections. That was my original point.
> most students have no idea what they want when they start college
They should speak to a guidance counsellor, then. No one invests in a business not "knowing what they want"; why should investing in an education be any different?