Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zedred 3354 days ago
I was hopeful at first. A large VC funded company with a big full time team should run circles around a small open source effort, but their security is still way behind Signal. I was also quickly put off by their "less than honest" marketing.
1 comments

Could you share details on "security is still way behind Signal"?

Edit: found previous discussion, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13132157

I haven't directly explored the source for either in little while, so I should take a new look. I might be a little out of date, but the things that I have seen second hand recently confirmed my earlier conclusions.

Like I recently saw an announcement from Wire that calls are now secure, but they had been advertising them as secure all along! I had even spent time looking through the code but didn't know that calls weren't authenticated. Now are they really secure? I don't know, they said that before too, and the source is so hard to follow. Then I saw a post that showed they weren't even doing cert pinning, which is so basic.

I wanted to like it, but the more I looked the more I felt like "security" was just sprinkled on as an after thought.

Did you see that they implemented CBR for audio calls and submitted patches to both Signal and WebRTC?

https://medium.com/@wireapp/call-security-constant-bit-rate-...

In 2017... CBR has been a thing in secure calling apps for ~5 years now.
Can you recommend some iOS/Android apps which support CBR?
Silent Phone is both Android and iOS compatible, and we have used CBR codecs since we launched (in 2012).
Care to name one?
Silent Phone (disclosure: I am an employee)