Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ChuckMcM 3361 days ago
I was a bit surprised that the article didn't include 'Foursquare Hedge Fund' as yet another way to make money. Seems like they could exploit their own data just as easily.
6 comments

Of course I really have no idea how difficult it would be to 'start' or manage a hedge fund. However I have met people who have run hedge funds and presumably such a person could be hired. Or more simply an exclusive partnership could be established with an existing hedge fund which was already able to use the data.

The underpinning of my surprise was the business case analysis. Your the CEO of Foursquare and you're looking at all the ways you can use your assets and services to generate revenue. You come up with selling this sort of demographic data. That gives you revenue $X. Now one of the buyers of your demographic data is hedge funds that are making a return Y % on their investments. Which increases a marginal amount dZ % when they incorporate your data into their strategies and algorithms. If you could accurately characterize the impact you could compare 1/2dZ % annually to the $X value to see which was larger. Conversely you could take say $10M and put it into the hedge fund and have them remit back to you 1/2 of the annual return each year and compare that to $X.

And of course if you're Goldman Sachs does it make sense to buy FourSquare and keep all the data for yourself? One could look at that investment in a similar way using internal rate of return on the buyout price vs the improved rates of return on their investment products.

That's like saying why doesn't Bloomberg have a hedge fund . There is a difference between selling financial information and operating a hedge fund .
Aside from the fact that they are a data company, not a fund... While what they are doing is completely legal it's safer for the company investing off of data to be separate from the company creating the data. Less conflicts of interest in the event it eventually becomes a legal issue.
Would this not count as a weak form of insider information?
No. Insider information has to ultimately come from an insider. Foursquare isn't getting its information from companies, it is getting them from its users.
I don't think so. It's easier to say that on paper, but in the real world, there are things like emotions, irrational people, and expectations.
Need some risk capital for that. Where's that going to come from, when investors have already risked $166 million?